Choosing the wrong manufacturing partner can cost you your brand reputation, your regulatory compliance, and your customers. Here's the framework we recommend to every brand evaluating a mushroom supplement manufacturer.
The European supplement market is growing rapidly, and with it, the number of companies claiming to offer GMP-certified mushroom manufacturing. But 'GMP-certified' is not a single standard — it encompasses a spectrum of practices, certifications, and interpretations that vary significantly between manufacturers. Choosing the wrong partner can expose your brand to regulatory risk, product recalls, and reputational damage that takes years to recover from.
Having worked with supplement brands across Europe for years, we've developed a clear framework for evaluating manufacturing partners. These are the seven questions that separate credible manufacturers from those who use 'GMP' as a marketing term.
In Europe, the relevant GMP standards for food supplements are EU GMP (Regulation EC 1223/2009 for cosmetics, and the food supplement-specific guidelines under Regulation EC 178/2002), ISO 22000 (food safety management), and FSSC 22000. A manufacturer claiming 'GMP certified' should be able to provide a current certificate from an accredited third-party certification body — not a self-declaration. Ask for the certificate number, the issuing body, and the expiry date. Then verify it independently.
Medicinal mushroom supply chains are complex. Raw materials sourced from unverified suppliers in regions with lax agricultural standards can contain heavy metals, pesticide residues, or microbial contamination that no amount of downstream processing can fully remediate. A credible manufacturer should be able to provide a full traceability document for every raw material batch — from the farm or wild harvest location, through import and storage, to the production batch. They should also conduct incoming quality control testing on every raw material delivery.
In-house testing is a necessary but insufficient quality control measure. Any manufacturer worth partnering with should conduct third-party testing on finished products through an ISO 17025-accredited laboratory. The minimum testing panel for medicinal mushroom products should include: beta-glucan content (the primary efficacy marker), heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury), microbial contamination (total plate count, yeast, mould, E. coli, Salmonella), and pesticide residues. Ask to see a recent Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for a product similar to what you intend to manufacture.
| Test Parameter | Why It Matters | Acceptable Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-glucan content | Primary efficacy marker — verifies potency | Matches label claim ±10% |
| Heavy metals | Mushrooms bioaccumulate metals from substrate | EU maximum limits (Regulation 2023/915) |
| Microbial contamination | Safety — especially for immune-compromised users | EU food supplement limits |
| Pesticide residues | Agricultural contamination risk | EU MRL (Regulation 396/2005) |
| Mycotoxins | Fungal toxins from improper storage | EU limits (Regulation 1881/2006) |
| Solvent residues | Residual extraction solvents | EU pharmacopoeia limits |
In the event of a product recall or regulatory inquiry, you need to be able to trace every component of every batch back to its source. A GMP-compliant manufacturer maintains batch production records that document every ingredient, every process step, every operator, and every quality check for every production run. Ask your potential manufacturer to walk you through their batch documentation process and confirm that records are retained for a minimum of 5 years (the EU standard for food supplements).
High MOQs are a significant barrier for emerging brands and a red flag in some cases — manufacturers with very high MOQs may not have the flexibility to accommodate the quality controls needed for smaller, specialized batches. Look for a manufacturer that offers pilot runs (typically 10–20% of full production scale) that allow you to validate your formula, packaging, and labeling before committing to a full production run. Pilot runs should be produced under the same GMP conditions as full production — not in a 'development kitchen.'
European food supplement regulations vary by country — what's permissible in one EU member state may require notification or approval in another. A strong manufacturing partner should have in-house regulatory expertise or established relationships with regulatory consultants who can support your product registration, labeling compliance, and Novel Food assessments if required. This is particularly relevant for mushroom products, as some species (particularly those with traditional use outside Europe) may require Novel Food authorization under EU Regulation 2015/2283.
Any manufacturer unwilling to allow a facility audit — either in person or via a qualified third-party auditor — should be disqualified immediately. A GMP-certified facility should welcome audits as a demonstration of their quality culture. During a facility visit, pay attention to: cleanliness and organization of production areas, segregation of allergen and non-allergen materials, pest control evidence, temperature and humidity monitoring, and the professionalism of the quality team.
At FUNGY, we welcome facility visits from prospective B2B partners and provide full documentation packages including our GMP and ISO 22000 certificates, recent third-party CoAs, and batch documentation examples. If you're evaluating manufacturing partners for your mushroom supplement line, we'd be happy to arrange a consultation and facility tour. Contact us at [email protected].
Contact our B2B team to request samples, discuss formulations, or get a manufacturing quote.